Opus One. Heard of it?
Maybe you only know it as a Jay-Z lyric, but Opus One helped
put Napa Valley’s Cabernet Sauvignon on the world wine map. First created in
1979 as a joint venture of California’s Robert Mondavi and Baron Philippe de
Rothschild, owner of Chateau Mouton Rothschild – producers of the first-growth
Bordeaux of the same name. Opus One was, at the time, the most expensive wine
produced in California – retailing for $50. Opus One now retails for $235 per
bottle.
Alas, the Opus One folks did
not send along samples. But Opus One’s former cellarmaster, Mike Farmer, did.
(Thanks, also, to Susan at WineGlass Marketing.) When Mike retired from his
position, he and his son Lucas created Euclid Wines – drawing on his 30-plus
years of experience in the wine business.
For those unfamiliar with what
a “cellarmaster” does (and this included me until writing this review!) – this
individual is the person who’s in charge of all aspects of production at a
winery from when the containers of grapes come rolling in the door to when the
cases of bottled wine go rolling out. A winemaker draws up the strategy to
create a wine. The cellarmaster executes that strategy.
This father-son duo said they
wanted to make a Cabernet Sauvignon as their signature wine. They currently
produce a premium Cabernet (which is 97% Cabernet with 3% Syrah to round out
the blend) and a 100% Syrah, both produced from grapes grown on Howell Mountain
in Napa County. The geometrical-sounding name of the winery is Mike Farmer’s
middle name, passed down from his grandfather, Euclid Doucette. Farmer
describes his grandfather as “a man of intensity, integrity, and true to his
word,” and he tried to model his wines after the emotions stemming from that
familial respect.
Lucas and Mike Farmer |
There are fewer more direct
examples of the market’s invisible hand than wine price points. High-end wine
demands high-end prices because people are willing to shell out the cash. As
any marketing student will tell you, there are plenty of ways to make wine more
desirable aside from actually making a superior product. Fancy packaging, slick
marketing, using
adult film stars to garner positive reviews, and other tricks of the trade.
The Euclid 2010 Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon retails for $85, and
this is one of the few wines I’ve tried where I thought, “You know, this really
tastes like an $85 bottle of wine.” This cabernet is exceptionally well crafted
and offers some of the most interesting aromatics I’ve sniffed. My notes say
“peaches, cotton candy, crème brulee perfumed sweetness.” Needless to say,
these aren’t words that pop up in my reviews of reds very often. The flavor is
exceptionally well-balanced, full of vanilla, dark fruit, and super-balanced
tannin. The finish was lasting, gorgeous lushness. I grilled a couple of good
steaks, which I put next to some grilled beets with goat cheese and dill and it
was transcendently good.
The Euclid Cab is a fabulous
wine and it’s a shame it goes so quickly. I had the last half-glass in the
quiet of the Man Cave while mellowing out after the Sweet Partner in Crime had
retired for the evening. The wine tasted like Dobie Gray’s “Drift Away”
sounds at the end of a hard day.
The Euclid 2010 Sierra Foothills Syrah is not quite as pricey as its
sister Cab. The retail on this bottle is $40. Syrah is generally a couple of
orders of magnitude fruitier and deeper than Cabernet Sauvignon, so I didn’t
expect the same sort of subtlety we’d experienced. Even with that notion…wow,
what a contrast in style between these wines.
Returning to the previous
metaphor, if the Cabernet is a mellow 70’s tune, the Syrah is A Tribe Called Quest’s “Low
End Theory.” Good lawrd, I don’t know that I’ve ever experienced anything
quite like this wine. The nose is typical Syrah – plums, violets, and spice –
although it’s really well balanced and quite pretty. The mouthfeel is rich,
thick, and fruity…and then the bottom absolutely drops out of this inky, tannic
monster. Imagine the warming feel of a good bourbon or scotch and convert that
sensation to the fullness and depth of tannin and you’ve got this Syrah’s finish.
I could feel blackness filling my chest as I drank this down. While it’s not
the drying, mouth puckering tannin that it could be, it feels like a dark depth
charge. Boom.
I decided to do some lamb
chops as a pairing with this – and about halfway through the meal, the Sweet
Partner in Crime says, “I just can’t do it. It’s too big.” Caught between the
richness of the wine, the marbling of the chops and the savory nature of the
fennel and caper relish I’d done as a side, the SPinC overloaded. (My Uncle
Alan, in contrast, would have been in absolute heaven.) I got through my glass
and, upon seeing myself in the bathroom mirror later, noticed that a single
glass of the Euclid was sufficient to blacken my teeth.
We didn’t get through the
whole bottle. I put a VacuVin on it and sampled it over the next couple of
days. After a day, it hadn’t opened up much. After two days, some of the
lighter, more vanilla aspects of the nose started to come through – even though
the body was still enormous. I think it still needs more time. Make sure you
decant it for at least a couple of hours before you drink it. My half-hour
wasn’t enough. If you like wines this powerful, snag a couple of bottles to
hold for a few years.
No comments:
Post a Comment